Management
Options
Back
to Top
In Virginia Canada Goose
may NOT be
- trapped,
- captured,
- or killed without a permit.
|
Techniques used to manage Canada goose conflicts are broken into
3 major categories: husbandry methods, non-lethal methods, and
lethal methods. These categories are consistent with the hierarchical
design that characterizes most integrated pest management (IPM)
programs. Under an IPM program, you first must identify the conflict
and evaluate its seriousness, then you review and evaluate the
options that are available to relieve or permanently solve that
conflict. Then, based on the outcome of that assessment, you select
and apply the management strategies appropriate to the need, starting
first with the simple, inexpensive, and less invasive techniques,
but moving on to the more complex, expensive, or time demanding
options where need dictates. A general rule of thumb of an IPM
approach: lethal options generally are viewed as methods of last
resort, ones used only when all other methods prove ineffective.
Therefore, in this section, we present a review of options that
follow the IPM hierarchical approach.
Husbandry Methods
Because Canada geese often congregate near bodies of water where
easy access to adjacent foraging areas exists, the number of geese
at such sites may be reduced simply by minimizing the amount and/or
attractiveness of forage that exists near the pond. Reducing the
amount of fertilizer that you apply to vegetation surrounding
a pond also may decrease the nutritional quality of that forage
and make the site less attractive to geese. Other techniques to
consider include reducing or eliminating all mowing of vegetation
within 50-75 feet of the water's edge (Fig.
4), reducing the total amount of lawn area, planting the area
between the water's edge and the foraging area (i.e., the lawn)
with plants that are less palatable to geese, and refraining from
watering of lawns (which will make them less productive). Examples
of commonly used landscape plant species that generally are not
preferred foods of Canada geese include mature tall fescue, periwinkle,
myrtle, pachysandra, English ivy, hosta (or plantain lily), and
ground junipers. However, you should be aware that most of these
plant species are non-native, exotic plants, which may out compete
native vegetation and become invasive on the landscape-exercise
caution in selecting plants to avoid creating another problem.
Simply remember that the more tangled the pattern of growth in
that zone, the more difficult it is for geese to pass through
it on their way toward other food sources.
Canada geese often congregate in an area because they are being
fed. Although supplemental feeding of wildlife is popular, it
can attract large numbers of animals that eventually lead to site
degradation. Eliminating all supplemental feeding of geese is
the first step that should be taken to minimize conflicts with
Canada geese. When geese are attracted to farms that produce grain
crops, some managers have recommended use of bait stations or
lure crops as potential deterrents. Bait stations are structures
strategically located to provide loose grain to geese as an alternative
to them consuming the planted crops. Clearly, feeding stations
must be placed where large numbers of geese can be tolerated.
Lure crops, on the other hand, are fields of grain that have been
planted and purposefully left for geese or other waterfowl to
consume. However, both bait stations and lure crops actually may
lead to an increase in bird density locally as these birds are
attracted to the abundance of food. Additionally, it is illegal
to use either bait stations or lure crops during the regular hunting
season as this constitutes "baiting." If depredation
to crops has been attributed to migratory geese, farmers might
consider altering the planting and/or harvest schedule so that
the timing of plant emergence or peak ripeness does not coincide
with the anticipated time of migration.
Water levels can be manipulated to either eliminate the water
source or to flood an area and eliminate nesting opportunity.
However, purposefully flooding an area to drown eggs in existing
goose nests is not legal.
Recreational facilities and corporate properties where decorative
ponds are present often are favorite "hangouts" for
geese. During the design of such facilities, it is best to keep
all recreational fields or other pedestrian traffic and use areas
at least 450 feet from a water source. Also, every attempt should
be made to build into the design numerous natural obstructions
(e.g., trees, shrubs, rocks) that will serve as potential hiding
spots for predators of geese so that the wariness in geese can
be maximized.
Non-Lethal Methods
Non-lethal deterrents can be grouped into two main categories:
scare devices or strategies and physical deterrents. Scare devices
or strategies, by design, are intended to frighten or chase birds
away from an area whereas physical barriers are intended to prevent
birds from gaining access to an area.
Scare Strategies - Scaring Canada geese is a way to discourage
them from congregating in an area. However, use of scare techniques
must be prompt and persistent to be effective. Ideally, for maximum
effectiveness, scare devices should be in place prior to the onset
of damage. There are three broad categories of scare devices or
strategies: auditory, visual, and physical (or hazing).
Auditory scare devices make loud or objectionable noises that
frighten geese. One example is the propane cannon (Fig.
5), a device that makes a loud blast, but does not fire a
projectile. Under best conditions, 3 - 4 strategically placed
cannons may protect up to 25 acres from goose depredation. Many
of today's newer models of cannons come with variable timers and
rotators that increase effectiveness. Stationary noisemakers,
such as a cannon, should be moved every 2 - 3 days to prevent
habituation by geese.
Another type of auditory approach is use of pyrotechnics, such
as whistlers, noise bombs, shellcrackers, and screamer or banger
rockets. These firecracker-like devices are shot from a hand-held
pistol or 12-gauge shotgun out over a group of geese on land or
water where the projectile then explodes. Some of these devices
have a range of about 50 - 75 yards. Similarly, blanks can be
fired from regular firearms to disturb a group of geese, but the
zone of effectiveness is less than with other pyrotechnics. Before
using any of these techniques, you first should check local regulations
to be sure that discharge of a firearm is allowed in your locale.
Even if you live in a community where discharge of a firearm is
legal, you should notify your local police or sheriff's department
in advance of your intention to use these materials so that they
will be aware of the activity and avoid an unnecessary response
to calls of "shots being fired."
Distress calls of Canada geese can be recorded and played back
as a means to scare these birds. Recordings of distress calls
are most effective when played back loud enough (at least 80 decibels)
to be heard by geese at a distance. However, unless other deterrents
are used concurrently to reinforce the effect of the distress
calls, geese quickly will habituate to the distress stimulus and
ignore it over a relatively short period of time (usually within
3 - 4 days of repeated use). Currently, pre-recorded tapes of
the distress call may not be widely available commercially, but
a tape recording can be made easily with a personal recorder.
Visual frightening devices work by having the goose see, recognize
or interpret, and react to an image or object that represents
a potential threat to the animal. Although these devices usually
are quiet, inexpensive, and easy to implement, they often work
best when used in combination with or to reinforce another deterrent.
An example of a visual deterrent is a simple strobe light, which
might be sufficient enough to startle geese and provide temporary
relief from nighttime goose problems within a restricted area.
Mylar reflective tape (red on one side, shiny silver on the other;
Fig. 6), strung between posts
to form a fence or attached to a pole as streamers, captures and
casts off glints of sunlight as it flickers in the breeze, startling
nearby geese. Scarecrows, owl effigies, rubber snakes, and "eyespot"
balloons (Fig. 7) have been
touted as mechanisms that will stimulate the goose's innate fear
response. However, with most of these inanimate devices, geese
quickly will habituate to and ignore them, often in as little
as only 3 - 4 days. Black plastic garbage bags, cut into 2 halves
and stapled to 4-foot tall "tomato" stakes and placed
in agricultural fields (about 6 -10 flags/acre), have been successful
in reducing foraging damage caused by grazing geese. When using
eye-spot balloons, 3 to 5 balloons/acre usually are needed and
must be put in place before geese become acclimated to the site.
As noted earlier, greatest effectiveness is attained when all
of these devices are moved frequently (at least once every 2 -
3 days).
Hazing or harassment of geese often will provide more long-lasting
results than will inanimate stationary objects. Several examples
of hazing programs include use of radio-controlled toys, dogs,
and water spray devices. Although more labor intensive and expensive
to implement than simple visual or noise deterrents, use of radio-controlled
toy aircraft or boats presents more of a real threat to geese.
Model aircraft can be operated to fly over, buzz, or chase a group
of geese on land or water, whereas a model boat skimming along
the water's surface can herd geese away from an area. Care must
be used to avoid hitting or injuring any birds.
Dogs, especially border collies, have been trained to chase and
harass geese until the birds become uncomfortable using the site.
However, because geese continue to monitor favorite sites, as
soon as the dogs are removed from the area and the threat no longer
exists, they likely will return. Thus, this form of harassment
must be persistent and repeated to remain effective. Even the
family dog may offer some protection to your yard as it roams
the property, but local leash laws must be abided. Additionally,
it should be noted that it is illegal to allow any dog to catch
or harm a goose. Dogs also should be leashed or prevented from
chasing geese during the early summer molt when these birds are
flightless.
A number of new devices recently have entered the market that
use pressurized water sprayers and motion detector technology
to deter geese from entering a property. These devices are hooked
to a garden hose and are triggered when the motion detector senses
the approach of an animal, which then sends a spray of water over
the approaching animal (Fig. 8
and 9). After a few moments
where no further motion is detected, the device shuts off. Thus,
when placed along the normal approach lines of geese (e.g., where
they would walk up out of the pond toward their feeding area),
a line of defense theoretically can be established.
Physical Deterrents - Physical structures can be put into place
that will impede movement of geese from their resting or flocking
areas toward feeding areas. Such barriers can be created using
vegetation, fencing, or rocks. A shrubby hedge placed along the
shoreline of a water body will block the pathways geese use to
exit the water and also will prevent them from seeing potential
predators that might lurk on the upland side of the barrier. Vegetated
barriers are most effective where the shrub's branches are compact
and begin right at ground level.
Fencing, installed just shoreward of the waterline, can be constructed
from a variety of materials, including mylar tape, metal mesh
(e.g., woven wire, chain link, chicken wire fencing), plastic
or synthetic mesh (snow fencing, silt fencing, plastic netting),
wood (corn cribbing, picket fencing), or strand (e.g., steel wire,
monofilament or Kevlar® lines). Maximum mesh or opening size
should be no larger than 3 inches and the structure should be
at least 25 inches tall. Although certain designs of electric
fences may be effective in deterring geese, you must check with
local authorities to determine if regulations restrict their use
in your area. Certainly, electric fencing should not be used where
small children have access to the deterrent. Obvious warning signs
must be posted on the fence wherever and whenever an electric
fence is used. Additionally, utmost care must be exercised when
using any form of electric fencing near water.
To prevent geese from landing on small water bodies, a wire grid
can be constructed above the surface of the water. Individual
wires or lines (e.g., Kevlar® string) making up the grid are
staked to the ground about 12 inches above the water's surface
and on 20-foot centers. Where need exists to allow human traffic
or equipment to operate on or near the water, the grid can be
elevated on larger posts to accommodate such uses, but access
to geese entering from the sides and beneath the grid must be
prevented.
Rock barriers, constructed of boulders approximately 2 feet in
diameter, can be placed haphazardly around the perimeter of a
body of water to again prevent geese from easily moving to and
from the water to the grassy feeding areas. These strategically
located obstacles also create additional potential predator hiding
spots that increase a goose's wariness. When rock barriers are
used in combination with a vegetated barrier, both deterrent effectiveness
and aesthetic appeal of the landscape can be enhanced.
Chemical repellents may help keep geese from congregating in
areas where their presence is not desired. Repellents typically
have broad public acceptance because they do not harm the geese
(when applied according to manufacturer's directions) and they
easily can be applied directly to a problem site. However, as
with most repellents, the effectiveness of a product likely will
wane over time and frequent reapplication may be needed to achieve
the desired deterrent effectiveness. One chemical, methyl anthranilate
(the food additive used to create artificial "grape"
flavoring), has been approved for use as a goose repellent by
the US Environmental Protection Agency and is available under
the name ReJeX-iT®. This product is formulated for application
in four settings: on landfill refuse and the open pools or standing
water on these sites, as an area fogging material, on open water
bodies, and on turf. As is the case for any registered chemical,
users must follow label instructions carefully and recognize potential
cautions associated with its use (e.g., ReJeX-iT® may cause
eye and skin irritation following prolonged or unprotected contact).
Lethal Methods
Where husbandry and non-lethal deterrents fail to achieve the
desired reduction in goose damage or conflict, use of some form
of population or reproductive control often is warranted and is
aimed specifically at reducing the number of geese per unit area.
Because the Canada goose is a regulated species, no one should
implement any form of reproductive or population control techniques
without prior review by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries on the need for
applicable federal and/or state permits.
Recreational hunting traditionally has been the preferred method
of choice by state and federal wildlife agencies to manage Canada
goose populations. Hunting has proven to be an effective and cost-efficient
method to control goose populations in rural and agricultural
areas. However, the opportunity to use hunters is limited in suburban/urban
centers where many human-goose conflicts have arisen. Obviously,
safety issues are of paramount concern. However, access to areas
where geese have congregated also is problematic. Hunting regulations
have been liberalized in recent years to accommodate special-early
and/or late seasons on non-migratory populations. Yet, hunting
alone likely will not be sufficient to keep goose populations
in balance with human desires in urban areas. Special population
reduction "round-ups" or hunts have been permitted by
federal and state authorities for specific high need areas, such
as on and around commercial airports and water supply reservoirs,
as well as in other high human-goose contact areas, such as on
golf courses, municipal parks, industrial sites.
According to state and federal laws, it is illegal to destroy
the nest of any regulated or protected bird species once the nest
has been completed and it contains either eggs or young birds-a
permit from the US Fish and Wildlife Service is required before
such activities can be implemented. However, as a means to deter
a bird from placing a nest where it will be inconvenient or become
a nuisance, you are allowed to remove nesting materials on a daily
basis before it is completed and becomes occupied. Such frequent
disturbance may be sufficient to encourage the pair to nest elsewhere.
Assuming that all proper permits have been obtained from authorities
in advance, oiling, shaking, or puncturing goose eggs found in
a nest are examples of methods used to prevent eggs from hatching.
An egg that has been oiled (usually with benign mineral oil) will
not allow air to pass through the shell to and from the embryo
inside and prevents it from properly developing. Embryos also
can be destroyed by shaking each egg vigorously until a sloshing
sound is heard inside it. Thin, strong pins also can be used to
puncture the eggshell, which will allow bacteria to enter the
egg as well as desiccate its contents. These approaches work best
if applied as soon as possible after the last egg is laid and
before the embryo becomes more fully developed. Unless dummy eggs
are used to replace those that are destroyed, do not remove eggs
from a nest-a loss of an entire clutch of eggs will trigger the
female's instinctive behavior to re-nest and produce another clutch,
whereas a clutch of compromised eggs will hold the female on that
nest as she tries to incubate them. Eventually, by the time the
female realizes that her eggs are not going to hatch, it will
be too late in the season to begin a new clutch and further breeding
will have been prevented.
A much more invasive and costly approach to population control
is that of sterilization, also referred to as surgical neutering.
Here, a male goose is captured and, through use of surgical techniques,
is prevented from successfully breeding again. Obviously, this
is not a simple field technique and requires trained personnel
and special conditions to assure the well-being of treated individuals.
Today, where need exists for an immediate reduction in a local
goose population, several techniques are available. During the
time of year when geese are flightless (i.e., during summer molt),
large groups of geese can be herded using net panels and corralled
into a holding pen. Individual flightless birds also can be captured
with long-handled nets or animal control capture poles. At times
of the year when geese are not flightless, these birds can be
captured using some form of propelled netting. Cannon nets, spring-powered
nets, rocket nets, and hand-held net launchers all are devices
that shoot a weighted net over a group of geese and allow one
to catch multiple birds at one time. Most cannon or rocket nets
are about 25 x 50 feet in dimension and come with 1.5 - 2.5 inch
mesh. To be successful, netting must be conducted in a large,
open area that is free of obstructions that could catch and tangle
the net. Additionally, netting programs work best where geese
have been attracted through a "pre-baiting" effort (i.e.,
grain or other food material has been provided to attract birds
to the desired location). Any such capture work must be coordinated
through and authorized by the Virginia Department of Game and
Inland Fisheries.
Another way to capture smaller groups of Canada geese is through
use of the immobilizing chemical Alpha-chloralose. When properly
formulated and administered, alpha-chloralose is a slow acting,
non-lethal chemical that is applied to bait and then fed to geese.
Once a bird has eaten a sufficient amount of treated bait, the
affected bird is unable to fly or escape and can be captured easily
by hand. Alpha-chloralose is a Restricted Use Pesticide; only
those individuals who have received special training through the
US Department of Agriculture and possess the required federal
permits are allowed to apply alpha-chloralose. Because of the
means by which alpha-chloralose works, any birds that have been
treated with alpha-chloralose are not suitable for consumption
by humans.
In the past, geese that were captured in areas where they were
causing problems often were transported by federal or state wildlife
personnel to other locations where they would be less likely to
cause problems. However, because adult Canada geese have strong
homing instincts, many returned to their former nesting areas
(generally speaking, resident geese must be relocated >200
miles away to prevent them from returning). However, few areas
remain in Virginia today where Canada geese are not already plentiful
and many communities are no longer willing to accept or tolerate
additional birds. Thus, goose relocation efforts have all but
ceased. Today, problem geese that are live-captured typically
are sent to USDA-inspected processing plants for preparation for
donation to local food banks for the needy. Here in Virginia,
the US Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services agency provides
on-site technical assistance (on a contract/fee basis) to municipalities
and residential communities confronted with resident Canada goose
problems. In 2000, USDA's Wildlife Services goose management program
donated approximately 2,100 Canada goose breast fillets through
the Hunters for the Hungry program for distribution to food banks
throughout Virginia.
Virginia Sources
Managing
Wildlife Damage: Canada Goose, Virginia Cooperative Extension
Other Sources
Best
practices for Nuisance Wildlife Control Operators in New York
State
Canada
Goose Web Page, University of Minnesota Extension Service
Canada
Goose Management Series: Exclusion, Rutgers Cooperative Research
& Extension
Managing
Canada Geese,Purdue University Plant and Pest Diagnostic Laboratory
Nuisance Canada Goose Control, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Ohio State University Extension Fact Sheet
Prevention
and Control of Wildlife Damage-1994
|